By Francisco Suárez, John P. Doyle
This isn't a full-on statement on Aristotle's Metaphysics within the comparable method as Aquinas' is. Suarez is going via every one part asking a couple of questions after which referring the reader again to appropriate sections of his Metaphysical Disputations.
Read or Download A Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics: A Most Ample Index to the Metaphysics of Aristotle: Index Locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis PDF
Best metaphysics books
During the ebook, Roger Woolhouse offers a scientific remedy of the important metaphysical perspectives of those very important and interrelated philosophers, contemplating their parts of contract and war of words. Going past the traditional class of the 3 because the ''rationalists'', he explores their bills of what's genuine and the way this lies on the center in their philosophies.
Wittgenstein's later writings generate loads of controversy and debate, as do the results of his principles for such issues as attention, wisdom, language and the humanities. Oswald Hanfling addresses a widespeard tendency to ascribe to Wittgenstein perspectives that transcend these he truly held.
During this creation' we will cartoon the enterprise of ontology, or metaphysics, and shall find it at the map of studying. This should be performed simply because there are lots of methods of construing the be aware 'ontology' and due to the undesirable acceptance metaphysics has suffered until eventually lately - a good deserved one mostly.
Additional resources for A Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics: A Most Ample Index to the Metaphysics of Aristotle: Index Locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis
De Propaganda Fide, 1888), p. 32a. , q. 44, a. 1, tom. IV, p. 455b. 26 Cf. Opera omnia, tomus decimus tertius (Romae: Typis Riccardi Garroni, 1918), pp. 33b–34a. 27 Cf. In Summam Theologiam I, 2, 3, n. VII, in: S. Thomae Aquinatis, Omnia opera, tom. IV, p. , 44, 1, n. VIII, pp. 456b–57a. 28 Cf. In Summam contra Gentiles, I, c. 13, XXII–XXIII, in S. Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia, tom. xiii, p. 39ab. 29 Cf. , Defensiones theologiae Divi Thomae Aquinatis, II, d. 14, q. 1, a. 1, ed. C. Paban et T. Pègues (Turonibus: Sumptibus A.
43 Cf. Suárez, Commentaria ac disputationes in tertiam partem D. Thomae, scilicet, opus de Incarnatione, III, q. 15, a. 8, in Opera, vol. 18, pp. 213–214. 982b21– 32. 45 Cf. 982b30. 46 Cf. In 12 libros Metaphys. I, c. 2, lect. 3, Cathala nos. 61–3. 47 On this supposed, but really non-existent, translation by Boethius, cf. Gudrun Vuillemin-Diem, Praefatio Wilhelm von Moerbekes Übersetzung der Aristotelischen Metaphysik, in Metaphysica, Lib. 1 (Leiden/New York/Köln, 1995), pp. 2–3. In one place [De unitate intellectus contra Averroistas, c.
949–961) considers the relations which exist among causes themselves. 61 Cf. vol. 25, pp. 399–409. In these sections Suárez deals mainly with the pre-Socratics, whom he divides into those who posited several material principle and those who said there was only one such principle; cf. DM 13, 2, 1, p. 399. His sources include Aristotle, Diogenes Laertius, Plato, Plotinus, Theophrastus, Plutarch, Sts. Augustine, Irenaeus, Clement of Rome, Clement of Alexandria, Ambrose, plus Epiphanius and Eusebius; ibid.
A Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics: A Most Ample Index to the Metaphysics of Aristotle: Index Locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis by Francisco Suárez, John P. Doyle